HKSAR V. SO TSUN FUNG (蘇浚鋒)

[2026] HKCFA 25 Court of Final Appeal 17 June 2026 • FACC3/2025 • 44 min read

13 cases cited (0 HK, 13 foreign)

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

I would dismiss the appeal.

Source: [2026] HKCFA 25, Court of Final Appeal, decided 17 June 2026. Read directly from the judgment.

Judges (5)

Cheung Coram Fok Coram Gummow Coram Lam Coram Ribeiro Coram

Counsel (9)

Department of Justice Firm Ho Kan Lawyers Firm Anthony Chau Counsel Respondent Benjamin Yu Counsel Respondent Carter Chim Counsel Appellant Ivan Shiu Counsel Respondent Jason Szeto Counsel Appellant Karen Ng Counsel Respondent Yvonne Leung Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

HKSAR Respondent So Tsun Fung Appellant

Case Significance

HKSAR v So Tsun Fung (蘇浚鋒) [2026] HKCFA 25 was decided by the Court of Final Appeal on 17 June 2026. It follows an earlier stage of the same proceedings, HKSAR v So Tsun Fung (蘇浚鋒) [2025] HKCFA 18. The Court's disposition was that: 'I would dismiss the appeal.'

What was the outcome in HKSAR v So Tsun Fung [2026] HKCFA 25?

The Court of Final Appeal dismissed the appeal, with the Court stating: 'I would dismiss the appeal.' The 2026 decision followed an earlier stage of the same case, HKSAR v So Tsun Fung (蘇浚鋒) [2025] HKCFA 18.

Statutes Cited

Basic Law

Art 25 Art 26 Art 27 Art 39

Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance (Cap 383)

Cases Cited (13)

UK (2)

[2006] 1 AC 173 [2008] 1 AC 1312

HK (11)

(1999) 2 HKCFAR 442 (2005) 8 HKCFAR 229 (2016) 19 HKCFAR 372 (2017) 20 HKCFAR 425 (2018) 21 HKCFAR 324 (2020) 23 HKCFAR 518 (2021) 24 HKCFAR 33 (2024) 27 HKCFAR 434 [2009] 2 HKLRD 166 [2025] 2 HKLRD 111 [2025] HKCFA 18