Ho Kan Lawyers 灝勤律師事務所

11 cases · 13 lawyers

Ho Kan Lawyers appears in 11 reported Hong Kong judgments (2025–2026), most often before the HKCFI.

About Ho Kan Lawyers

Ho Kan Lawyers appears in 11 reported Hong Kong judgments (2025–2026). These were heard before HKCFI (4), HKDC (3) and HKCFA (2).

Source: derived from 11 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision 17 June 2026. Published on HKLII.

In the court record

Ho Kan Lawyers (灝勤律師事務所) is a Hong Kong law firm whose reported matters, dated 2025 to 2026, were most often instructed as counsel for the applicant, appearing across both appellate and first-instance courts and most often before the Court of First Instance. The practice spans Criminal Law, Judicial Review & Immigration and Land & Property, reflected in the proceedings across multiple instances of HKSAR v. So Tsun Fung (蘇浚鋒) [2026] HKCFA 25, [2025] HKCFA 18, [2025] HKCFI 2466 and [2025] HKCFI 916.

The firm has also acted as applicant in Lai Cheuk Yin v. Margaret Cheung Wai Fong and Another [2026] HKCA 1007 and its earlier instance [2025] HKCFI 2563, for the defendant in The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd v. Cham Wai Sing and Another [2026] HKCFI 2937, and as intervener in The Hong Kong Settlers Housing Corporation Ltd v. Wong Kwai Wing [2025] HKDC 262.

What is Ho Kan Lawyers' role profile in Hong Kong matters?

Ho Kan Lawyers was most often instructed as counsel for the applicant, appearing across appellate and first-instance courts, most often the Court of First Instance, with matters in Criminal Law, Judicial Review & Immigration and Land & Property between 2025 and 2026.

What Court of Final Appeal work has Ho Kan Lawyers handled?

The firm represented the appellant and applicant across proceedings in HKSAR v. So Tsun Fung (蘇浚鋒) [2026] HKCFA 25 and [2025] HKCFA 18 at the Court of Final Appeal.