RE SIMPLICITY & VOGUE RETAILING (HK) CO LTD

[2024] HKCA 299 Court of Appeal 23 April 2024 • CACV183/2023 • 27 min read
12 cases cited (0 HK, 12 foreign) Cited by 3 cases

Outcome

Petition dismissed

the petition was dismissed, as it was found by the judge there was no credible evidence to show that if given time the Condition would be complied with.

Source: [2024] HKCA 299, Court of Appeal, decided 23 April 2024. Read directly from the judgment.

Judges (3)

Counsel (6)

Case Significance

Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd [2024] HKCA 299 is a Court of Appeal decision dated 23 April 2024 concerning a winding-up petition. The Court dismissed the petition, holding that "the petition was dismissed, as it was found by the judge there was no credible evidence to show that if given time the Condition would be complied with." The decision was handed down alongside the related matter Arjowiggins HKK 2 Ltd v. Shandong Chenming Paper Holdings Ltd [2024] HKCA 352.

The decision has since been cited in Re Man Chun Sing Matthew (and 1 other) [2024] HKCFI 2286 and Re Chan Chiu Sum Royden [2026] HKCFI 2255.

Why was the petition dismissed in Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd ([2024] HKCA 299)?

In Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd [2024] HKCA 299, the Court of Appeal dismissed the petition because the judge found no credible evidence to show that, if given time, the Condition would be complied with.

Which case is linked to Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd on appeal ([2024] HKCA 299)?

Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd [2024] HKCA 299 is connected to Arjowiggins HKK 2 Ltd v. Shandong Chenming Paper Holdings Ltd [2024] HKCA 352, a related Court of Appeal winding-up decision handed down the same day, 23 April 2024.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (12)

UK (2)
[2015] Ch 589 [2020] EWHC 2075
HK (10)
(2023) 26 HKCFAR 119 [1997] HKLRD 828 [2015] 4 HKLRD 52 [2018] 2 HKLRD 449 [2019] 4 HKLRD 85 [2019] 5 HKLRD 646 [2022] 4 HKLRD 793 [2023] HKCFI 1443 [2023] HKCFI 2065 [2024] HKCA 352

Cited By (3)

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 9 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

Related cases

Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2024] HKCA 299)