W K To & Co 杜偉強律師事務所
W K To & Co appears in 31 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026), most often before the HKCFI.
About W K To & Co
W K To & Co appears in 31 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026). These were heard before HKCFI (19), HKDC (8) and HKCA (4).
Source: derived from 31 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision . Published on HKLII.
In the court record
W K To & Co (杜偉強律師事務所) is a Hong Kong law firm most often instructed as counsel for the plaintiff, appearing primarily at first instance in the Court of First Instance between 2024 and 2026. Its civil caseload includes Chan Yat Man v. Tung Po (H.K.) Technology Enterprise Ltd [2025] HKCA 423 and [2025] HKCFI 4400, Great Pacific Investments Ltd v. 张华荣 [2025] HKCA 266 and [2024] HKCA 1147, and Fuku Group Limited Formerly Known as Lionstar Group Ltd v. Rakich Investments Ltd Formerly Known as Computer Dynamics Ltd and Others [2025] HKCFI 3881, in each of which the firm acted for the plaintiff. It also appeared as petitioner in JC Success Ltd v. Cheung Theobald Aylwin and Others [2025] HKCFI 3837, and as respondent in Re Simplicity & Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd [2024] HKCA 299.
The reported matters also concern criminal law and drug offences, where the firm was instructed for the defence in HKSAR v. Li Wenbo [2026] HKDC 544, HKSAR v. Shum Pak Ue (and 1 other) [2025] HKCFI 4058 and HKSAR v. Cheung Hing Chik [2025] HKDC 296, and as counsel for the accused in HKSAR v. Cadelina Chymbelyn Generoso [2025] HKCFI 4976.
What areas of law does W K To & Co practise in Hong Kong?
W K To & Co's reported instructions between 2024 and 2026 span criminal law, drug offences and bankruptcy and insolvency matters, together with civil disputes such as Great Pacific Investments Ltd v. 张华荣 [2025] HKCA 266, appearing most often as counsel for the plaintiff.
Which courts has W K To & Co appeared before?
W K To & Co appears primarily at first instance in the Court of First Instance, with reported matters also reaching the District Court and the Court of Appeal, including Chan Yat Man v. Tung Po (H.K.) Technology Enterprise Ltd [2025] HKCA 423.
What role has W K To & Co played in reported criminal proceedings?
In reported Hong Kong criminal matters such as HKSAR v. Shum Pak Ue (and 1 other) [2025] HKCFI 4058 and HKSAR v. Li Wenbo [2026] HKDC 544, W K To & Co was instructed as counsel for the defendant.
Practice Areas (from the 39-area taxonomy)
Frequently instructed alongside
How many cases has W K To & Co been involved in?
W K To & Co appears in 31 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026).
Which courts does W K To & Co appear in?
W K To & Co appears before HKCFI (19), HKDC (8) and HKCA (4).