HKSAR V. TAM HO NAM (譚浩南)

[2022] HKCFA 9 Court of Final Appeal 5 May 2022 • FAMC6/2022 • 11 min read

9 cases cited (0 HK, 9 foreign) Cited by 2 cases

Judges (3)

Counsel (5)

Department of Justice Firm ONC Lawyers Firm Eric TM Cheung Counsel Applicant Ira Lui Counsel Respondent Jason Kung Counsel Applicant

Parties (2)

HKSAR Respondent Tam Ho Nam Applicant

Summary

Tam Ho Nam applied for leave to appeal against his conviction for the murder of his girlfriend in 2009, after being convicted in a third trial following two previous convictions that were quashed. The key issues concerned the admissibility of evidence and whether the trial judge properly directed the jury. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed.

Cases Cited (9)

UK (3)

[2005] 1 WLR 1513 [2005] 3 All ER 885 [2005] UKHL 25

HK (6)

(1999) 2 HKCFAR 539 (2014) 17 HKCFAR 545 (2014) 17 HKCFAR 825 (2017) 20 HKCFAR 414 [2011] 2 HKLRD 436 [2021] HKCA 1384

Cited By (2)

[2023] HKCFA 27

HKSAR V. SHU MAN (舒曼)

[2023] HKCFA 18

HKSAR V. NG CHIU MAN (吳釗民)

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 3 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

[2022] HKCA 1021 Court of Appeal

7 December 2022

[2023] HKCFA 18 Court of Final Appeal

18 July 2023

[2023] HKCFA 27 Court of Final Appeal

4 September 2023