HKSAR V. WONG CHUN YAU (黃竣佑)
10 cases cited
(0 HK, 10 foreign)
Cited by 1 case
Outcome
Leave to appeal dismissedleave to appeal was dismissed.
Source: [2021] HKCFA 33, Court of Final Appeal, decided 27 September 2021. Read directly from the judgment.
Judges (3)
Counsel (6)
Parties (2)
Summary
Wong Chun Yau applied for leave to appeal out of time against his conviction for trafficking in a dangerous drug. The case raised the issue of whether the trial judge should have left a lesser alternative verdict of simple possession to the jury when the applicant's defence was a total denial. The application was dismissed.
Statutes Cited
Dangerous Drugs Ordinance (Cap 134)
Cases Cited (10)
UK (2)
[1987] 1 AC 303 [2006] 1 WLR 2154
HK (8)
(2008) 11 HKCFAR 354 (2014) 17 HKCFAR 825 (2016) 19 HKCFAR 640 (2019) 22 HKCFAR 368 (2020) 23 HKCFAR 220 [2010] 4 HKLRD 614 [2021] HKCA 120 [2021] HKCFA 13
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2022] HKCFA 9 HKCFA
HKSAR V. TAM HO NAM (譚浩南)
5 May 2022
[2021] HKCFA 21 HKCFA
HKSAR V. CHAN HON WING (陳漢榮)
12 July 2021
[2026] HKCFA 9 HKCFA
EXCELLENCE RAISE OVERSEAS LIMITED, JOLLY ADMIRE LIMITED, HIGH EXPRESS HOLDINGS LIMITED V. ANZ COMMODITY TRADING PTY LTD
13 February 2026
[2026] HKCFA 3 HKCFA
HKSAR V. HUANG RUIFANG (黃瑞芳)
16 January 2026
[2025] HKCA 1018 HKCA
HKSAR V. CHEUNG MAN KONG
12 November 2025
[2025] HKCFA 21 HKCFA
CHUI MARJORIE CHE YING, CHUI TONI YIM V. APPEAL TRIBUNAL (BUILDINGS), BUILDING AUTHORITY
6 November 2025
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2021] HKCFA 33)