HKSAR V. KHAW KIM SUN (許金山)
14 cases cited
(0 HK, 14 foreign)
Cited by 1 case
Judges (5)
Counsel (7)
Parties (2)
Summary
Khaw Kim Sun appealed against his murder conviction for killing his wife and daughter by placing a carbon monoxide-filled yoga ball in their car. The Court of Final Appeal considered whether the trial judge's directions regarding the 'missing' stopper caused substantial and grave injustice. The appeal was dismissed, with the Court finding the directions were adequate.
Statutes Cited
Criminal Procedure Ordinance
s 83(1)
Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance
s 17(2)
Cases Cited (14)
UK (1)
[1967] 1 AC 760
HK (13)
(2001) 4 HKCFAR 457 (2002) 5 HKCFAR 209 (2003) 6 HKCFAR 113 (2005) 8 HKCFAR 387 (2006) 9 HKCFAR 118 (2006) 9 HKCFAR 827 (2008) 11 HKCFAR 623 (2009) 12 HKCFAR 502 (2010) 13 HKCFAR 27 (2017) 20 HKCFAR 149 [2022] HKCA 1602 [2022] HKCA 802 [2023] HKCFA 13
Cited By (1)
Citation influence
HKLII records this judgment as cited by 2 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2023] HKCFA 13 HKCFA
HKSAR V. KHAW KIM SUN (許金山)
6 June 2023
[2024] HKCFA 10 HKCFA
HKSAR V. KHAW KIM SUN (許金山)
23 April 2024
[2024] HKCFI 3536 HKCFI
HKSAR V. KHAW KIM SUN
6 November 2024
[2024] HKCFI 3535 HKCFI
HKSAR V. KHAW KIM SUN
5 November 2024
[2025] HKCA 651 HKCA
HKSAR V. MA CHE HOU
21 August 2025
[2025] HKCA 718 HKCA
HKSAR V. YIP KA YU
30 July 2025
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2023] HKCFA 37)