HKSAR V. CHAN KAM CHING (陳鑑清)

[2021] HKCFA 43 Court of Final Appeal 13 December 2021 • FAMC7/2021 • 2 min read

2 cases cited (0 HK, 2 foreign) Cited by 2 cases

Judges (3)

Counsel (6)

Chui & Lau Firm Department of Justice Firm Karry Lau Counsel Applicant Maggie Wong Counsel Applicant Sabra Lo Counsel Respondent Virginia Lau Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

HKSAR Respondent Chan Kam Ching Applicant

Summary

Chan Kam Ching, a solicitor convicted of using a false instrument and using a copy of a false instrument in connection with property dealings under the Small House Policy, applied for leave to appeal. The key issue was the proper meaning of 'false' for the purposes of forgery-related offences under the Crimes Ordinance. Leave to appeal was granted.

Statutes Cited

Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200)

Cases Cited (2)

HK (2)

[2019] HKDC 611 [2021] HKCA 7

Cited By (2)

[2022] HKCFA 13

HKSAR V. CHAN KAM CHING

[2022] HKCFA 7

HKSAR V. CHAN KAM CHING (陳鑑清)

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 1 later judgment. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

[2022] HKCFA 7 Court of Final Appeal

14 April 2022