HKSAR V. CHAN KAM CHING
Counsel (8)
Parties (2)
Summary
Following the Court's substantive judgment allowing Chan Kam Ching's appeal and quashing his forgery convictions, this costs judgment dealt with consequential costs orders. The appeal had been concerned with what constitutes falsity for the purposes of forgery-related offences under the Crimes Ordinance. The Court made appropriate costs orders including an order for costs from central funds.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (13)
Cited By (1)
Citation influence
HKLII records this judgment as cited by 12 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2022] HKCFA 13)