HKSAR V. CHAN KAM CHING

[2022] HKCFA 13 Court of Final Appeal 22 June 2022 • FACC10/2021 • 12 min read
13 cases cited (0 HK, 13 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Judges (5)

Counsel (8)

Parties (2)

Summary

Following the Court's substantive judgment allowing Chan Kam Ching's appeal and quashing his forgery convictions, this costs judgment dealt with consequential costs orders. The appeal had been concerned with what constitutes falsity for the purposes of forgery-related offences under the Crimes Ordinance. The Court made appropriate costs orders including an order for costs from central funds.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (13)

HK (13)
(1999) 2 HKCFAR 531 (2005) 8 HKCFAR 80 (2007) 10 HKCFAR 696 (2007) 10 HKCFAR 730 (2010) 13 HKCFAR 689 (2014) 17 HKCFAR 319 (2014) 17 HKCFAR 575 (2015) 18 HKCFAR 1 (2015) 18 HKCFAR 158 [2019] HKDC 611 [2021] HKCA 7 [2021] HKCFA 43 [2022] HKCFA 7

Cited By (1)

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 12 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

Related cases

Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2022] HKCFA 13)