SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE V. TAM KIT-I (and 3 others)

[2023] HKCFA 7 Court of Final Appeal 29 March 2023 • FACC1/2023; FACC4/2022; FACV2/2023; FACV12/2022 • 61 min read
32 cases cited (0 HK, 32 foreign)

Outcome

Appeal allowed

I would allow the appeal and set aside the Court of Appeal’s order discharging the RO.

Source: [2023] HKCFA 7, Court of Final Appeal, decided 29 March 2023. Read directly from the judgment.

Judges (5)

Counsel (7)

Parties (2)

Summary

The Secretary for Justice appealed against Tam Kit-I in proceedings concerning the proper construction of the Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance. The case raised questions about the nature of restraint order proceedings and the proper classification of appeals as criminal or civil. The appeal addressed important questions of statutory interpretation.

Statutes Cited

Criminal Procedure Ordinance
s 83E
Magistrates Ordinance
s 72

Cases Cited (32)

UK (17)
[1943] AC 147 [1976] 1 QB 11 [1976] QB 11 [1985] 1 AC 622 [1986] 1 QB 791 [1987] 1 QB 963 [1987] 1 QB 972 [1991] 2 QB 520 [1992] 2 AC 205 [2001] 1 AC 268 [2001] 1 WLR 196 [2003] 1 AC 1099 [2011] 1 WLR 3253 [2014] 1 WLR 2228 [2019] 1 WLR 3766 [2019] AC 593 [2021] AC 392
HK (15)
(2004) 7 HKCFAR 212 (2009) 12 HKCFAR 877 (2022) 25 HKCFAR 34 [2000] 1 HKLRD 647 [2001] 2 HKLRD 851 [2005] 2 HKLRD 11 [2005] 3 HKC 545 [2009] 1 HKLRD 78 [2012] 2 HKC 523 [2012] 3 HKLRD 491 [2015] 1 HKLRD 240 [2016] 4 HKLRD 367 [2019] HKCFI 2931 [2022] HKCA 454 [2022] HKCFA 19

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 2 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

Related cases

Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2023] HKCFA 7)