THE SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE V. TAM KIT-I (and 1 other)

[2022] HKCFA 19 Court of Final Appeal 16 September 2022 • FAMC13/2022; FAMV367/2022 • 2 min read

Cited by 1 case

Judges (3)

Counsel (7)

Department of Justice Firm H M Tsang & Co Firm Benson Tsoi Counsel Respondent Denise Chan Counsel Applicant Douglas Lau Counsel Applicant Nigel Kat Counsel Respondent William Tam Counsel Applicant

Parties (2)

Secretary for Justice Applicant Tam Kit-I Respondent

Summary

The Secretary for Justice was granted leave to appeal regarding the proper construction of the Organized and Serious Crimes Ordinance (OSCO), specifically whether a restraint order can be maintained after acquittal or discontinuance of confiscation proceedings. The case also raised the question of whether an appeal against a judge's refusal to discharge a restraint order is criminal or civil in nature. Leave was granted on two questions of law.

Statutes Cited

Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200)

Cited By (1)

[2023] HKCFA 7

SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE V. TAM KIT-I (and 3 others)

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 2 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

[2023] HKCFA 7 Court of Final Appeal

29 March 2023

[2022] HKCA 1819 Court of Appeal

12 December 2022