HKSAR V. CHEN KEEN (ALIAS JACK CHEN) (陳克恩) (and 2 others)
Outcome
Leave to appeal grantedLeave to appeal was granted in respect of two questions : (1) What on the true construction of section 4 of the CCCO is the meaning of “where a defendant
Source: [2023] HKCFA 11, Court of Final Appeal, decided 24 May 2023. Read directly from the judgment.
Judges (5)
Counsel (10)
Summary
Chen Keen, Hao May and Yee Wenjye appealed against their convictions for conspiracy to defraud in relation to the acquisition of New Zealand farms by a Hong Kong listed company. The Court of Final Appeal considered the proper approach to dishonesty in conspiracy to defraud charges and the extra-territorial reach of Hong Kong's fraud laws. The appeals were allowed and the convictions were quashed.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (24)
Cited By (1)
Citation influence
HKLII records this judgment as cited by 8 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2023] HKCFA 11)