HKSAR V. WOO WING SEE, PHYLLIS (胡詠斯)
Cited by 1 case
Judges (3)
Counsel (7)
Parties (2)
Summary
Woo Wing See Phyllis sought leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal on the question of whether a letter from a prisoner to the Ombudsman is an article authorized by the Prison Rules to be carried out of a prison without further authorization from the Commissioner under section 18(1) of the Prisons Ordinance. The Appeal Committee granted leave, finding the question of requisite importance. The appeal was listed for hearing in May 2026.
Statutes Cited
Prisons Ordinance
s 18(1)
Cited By (1)
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2026] HKCFA 19 HKCFA
HKSAR V. WOO WING SEE PHYLLIS (胡詠斯)
5 June 2026
[2026] HKCFI 854 HKCFI
HKSAR V. LAI CHEE YING AND OTHERS (and 2 others)
9 February 2026
[2025] HKCFI 1667 HKCFI
HKSAR V. CHOW KA SHING AND ANOTHER
12 May 2025
[2025] HKCFI 6291 HKCFI
HKSAR V. LAI CHEE YING AND OTHERS
15 December 2025
[2024] HKCFI 3298 HKCFI
HKSAR V. NG GORDON CHING HANG AND OTHERS (and 1 other)
19 November 2024
[2024] HKCFI 1468 HKCFI
HKSAR V. NG GORDON CHING HANG AND OTHERS
30 May 2024
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2026] HKCFA 4)