HKSAR V. F.S.L.
Outcome
Appeal allowedI would accordingly allow the appeal and answer the certified question in the negative.
Source: [2026] HKCFA 13, Court of Final Appeal, decided 14 April 2026. Read directly from the judgment.
Counsel (6)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
HKSAR v. F.S.L. [2026] HKCFA 13 concerns a certified question of law before the Court of Final Appeal, following the Court of Appeal's judgment in HKSAR v. F.S.L. [2025] HKCA 598 and the Court of Final Appeal's own earlier ruling in HKSAR v. F.S.L. [2025] HKCFA 24. The Court of Final Appeal held: 'I would accordingly allow the appeal and answer the certified question in the negative.' The judgment draws on prior Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Reports authorities including (2015) 18 HKCFAR 292, (1999) 2 HKCFAR 539, (2018) 21 HKCFAR 167, (2016) 19 HKCFAR 279, (2010) 13 HKCFAR 142, (2013) 16 HKCFAR 195 and (2013) 16 HKCFAR 413, together with [1997] HKLRD 428 and comparative citations to [2013] EWCA Crim 2574 and [1951] 2 All ER 834.
What was the outcome of HKSAR v. F.S.L. [2026] HKCFA 13?
The Court of Final Appeal allowed the appeal in HKSAR v. F.S.L. [2026] HKCFA 13, holding 'I would accordingly allow the appeal and answer the certified question in the negative,' following the Court of Appeal judgment HKSAR v. F.S.L. [2025] HKCA 598.
Which earlier proceedings preceded HKSAR v. F.S.L. [2026] HKCFA 13?
HKSAR v. F.S.L. [2026] HKCFA 13 followed the Court of Appeal's decision in HKSAR v. F.S.L. [2025] HKCA 598 and the Court of Final Appeal's own leave ruling in HKSAR v. F.S.L. [2025] HKCFA 24, both concerning the same defendant.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (17)
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2026] HKCFA 13)