HKSAR V. SZE CHING LOK (施政樂)
2 cases cited
(0 HK, 2 foreign)
Judges (3)
Counsel (4)
Parties (2)
Summary
Sze Ching Lok applied for leave to appeal against his conviction, raising questions about the proper approach to evidence and directions in criminal proceedings. The case concerned the adequacy of the trial judge's summing up on key issues of fact. The application was dealt with on its merits.
Cases Cited (2)
HK (2)
(2017) 20 HKCFAR 98 [1997] HKLRD 652
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2025] HKCFI 1418 HKCFI
HKSAR V. DEWAN MD HATEM
24 January 2025
[2025] HKCA 1147 HKCA
CALUZA MARIA LOURDES GALANG AND ANOTHER V. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE
23 December 2025
[2025] HKCFI 6494 HKCFI
HKSAR V. AWAIS MOHAMMAD AND ANOTHER
11 December 2025
[2025] HKCFI 5938 HKCFI
CHOI KING HUNG V. FUNG SHING CHUNG
9 December 2025
[2025] HKCFI 5685 HKCFI
FUNG SHING CHUNG V. CHOI KING HUNG
20 November 2025
[2025] HKCA 1042 HKCA
HKSAR V. UMER-FAROOQ
19 November 2025
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2024] HKCFA 11)