HKSAR V. WONG FUNG (王豐)
9 cases cited
(0 HK, 9 foreign)
Judges (3)
Counsel (5)
Parties (2)
Summary
Wong Fung applied for leave to appeal against his conviction, raising questions about the adequacy of the trial judge's directions and the proper approach to circumstantial evidence. The case concerned the standard of proof and the proper evaluation of evidence in criminal proceedings. The application was dealt with on its merits.
Cases Cited (9)
UK (2)
[1986] 1 WLR 1202 [2006] 1 WLR 2154
HK (7)
(2008) 11 HKCFAR 354 (2019) 22 HKCFAR 368 [2021] 1 HKLRD 488 [2021] 3 HKLRD 94 [2021] HKCA 157 [2021] HKCFA 13 [2022] HKCA 1163
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2026] HKCFA 3 HKCFA
HKSAR V. HUANG RUIFANG (黃瑞芳)
16 January 2026
[2025] HKCFA 15 HKCFA
HKSAR V. HUANG RUIFANG (黃瑞芳)
22 August 2025
[2025] HKCA 647 HKCA
HKSAR V. HUI SHUK YEE CHERRY
24 July 2025
[2025] HKCA 509 HKCA
HKSAR V. HUANG RUIFANG
29 May 2025
[2025] HKCA 234 HKCA
HKSAR V. HUANG RUIFANG
5 March 2025
[2025] HKCFA 22 HKCFA
HKSAR V. CHEUNG ALBERT (張鼎) (and 1 other)
10 December 2025
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2023] HKCFA 8)