HKSAR V. HUANG RUIFANG
2 cases cited
(0 HK, 2 foreign)
Judges (3)
Counsel (5)
Parties (2)
Summary
Sentencing appeal in HKSAR v Huang Ruifang, where the Court of Appeal certified a point of law of great and general importance for the Court of Final Appeal regarding section 54(1)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Ordinance — specifically, what constitutes a prohibited prosecutorial comment on an accused's failure to testify and what remedies are appropriate for breach. The applicant was represented by Andrew Bruce SC on legal aid and Allen Judge on a pro bono basis.
Statutes Cited
Criminal Procedure Ordinance
s 54(1)(b) s 83(1) s 83(1)(c)
Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance
s 32(2)
Cases Cited (2)
HK (2)
[2024] 4 HKLRD 848 [2025] 2 HKLRD 138
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2026] HKCFA 3 HKCFA
HKSAR V. HUANG RUIFANG (黃瑞芳)
16 January 2026
[2025] HKCA 234 HKCA
HKSAR V. HUANG RUIFANG
5 March 2025
[2025] HKCFA 15 HKCFA
HKSAR V. HUANG RUIFANG (黃瑞芳)
22 August 2025
[2024] HKCA 840 HKCA
HKSAR V. HUANG RUIFANG
30 August 2024
[2023] HKCFA 8 HKCFA
HKSAR V. WONG FUNG (王豐)
20 April 2023
[2025] HKCA 1107 HKCA
THE JOINT AND SEVERAL TRUSTEE OF THE PROPERTY OF SO CHING WAN V. ASSEN LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) AND OTHERS
11 December 2025
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2025] HKCA 509)