FU MAN KIT V. SUPERINTENDENT OF TAI LAM CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
3 cases cited
(0 HK, 3 foreign)
Judges (3)
Counsel (5)
Summary
Fu Man Kit applied for habeas corpus or judicial review regarding his continued detention at Tai Lam Correctional Institution, following the Court's earlier decision on double jeopardy. The case raised questions about the consequences of the double jeopardy finding for the applicant's ongoing imprisonment. The application was dealt with on its merits.
Statutes Cited
Criminal Procedure Ordinance
s 67A
Cases Cited (3)
HK (3)
(2002) 5 HKCFAR 356 [2019] 4 HKLRD 483 [2022] 1 HKLRD 219
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2021] HKCFA 34 HKCFA
HKSAR V. FU MAN KIT (符文傑)
30 September 2021
[2021] HKCFA 10 HKCFA
HKSAR V. FU MAN KIT (符文傑)
17 March 2021
[2024] HKCA 290 HKCA
HKSAR V. LI CHEUNG CHOI
22 March 2024
[2026] HKCFI 1085 HKCFI
NANYANG COMMERCIAL BANK, LTD V. SUNGRADE DEVELOPMENT LTD
26 February 2026
[2025] HKCA 945 HKCA
BANK OF COMMUNICATIONS (HONG KONG) LTD V. CHINA FORTUNE ENTERPRISES LTD AND OTHERS
22 October 2025
[2025] HKCA 872 HKCA
LAM YING KUEN V. LAM CHOR KUEN AND OTHERS
29 September 2025
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2023] HKCFA 33)