[2021] HKCFA 6, HKSAR V. LEUNG CHUNG HANG SIXTUS (梁頌恆) - Judgment, Outcome & Holding

Judges (3)

Counsel (6)

Cedric & Co Firm Department of Justice Firm Douglas Kwok Counsel Applicant Howard Tang Counsel Applicant Jonathan Man Counsel Respondent Law Ka Sing Counsel Applicant

Parties (2)

HKSAR Respondent Leung Chung Hang Sixtus Applicant

Summary

Leung Chung Hang Sixtus was granted leave to appeal on a certified question of law regarding the proper test under section 18 of the Public Order Ordinance for the offence of disorderly behaviour likely to cause fear. The question concerned which alternative in Kulemesin v HKSAR should apply to the 'likely to cause fear' limb. Leave was granted with the appeal listed for hearing.

Statutes Cited

Public Order Ordinance

s 18

Cases Cited (1)

HK (1)

(2013) 16 HKCFAR 195

Cited By (1)

[2021] HKCFA 24

HKSAR V. LEUNG CHUNG HANG SIXTUS (梁頌恆)

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 2 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

[2021] HKCFA 24 Court of Final Appeal

16 July 2021

[2021] HKDC 751 區域法院

18 June 2021