SAMANTHA JANE BRADLEY V. SIR ELLY KADOORIE & SONS LIMITED (FOR AND ON BEHALF OF ITSELF, ITS CURRENT AND FORMER OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, INCLUDING ITS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, MESSRS SIMMONS & SIMMONS)
Practice Areas
Counsel (8)
Case Significance
Samantha Jane Bradley v. Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons Limited (for and on behalf of itself, its current and former officers, employees and agents, including its legal representatives, Messrs Simmons & Simmons) [2026] HKCFA 2 is a Court of Final Appeal decision dated 9 January 2026. The catchwords span the Basic Law (Art 35(1)), the Competition Ordinance, the High Court Ordinance (s 21L), the Landlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance, the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance, and the Rules of the High Court. Cases it drew on include the District Court decisions in Chan Woon Wah t/a Ngai Hing Decoration Company v. Wong Chi Ping [2024] HKDC 422 and Chan Yuk Ping v. Liew Shuk Fui [2024] HKDC 999. The proceeding continued at the Court of Final Appeal, with a further decision reported as Samantha Jane Bradley v. Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons Limited (for and on behalf of itself, its current and former officers, employees and agents, including its legal representatives, Messrs Simmons & Simmons) [2026] HKCFA 10. The January 2026 decision has also been cited in other Court of Appeal, Court of First Instance and District Court matters, including TW Recovery Ltd and Others v. Best Leader Precious Metals Ltd and Others [2026] HKCA 361, Chrome Hearts LLC and Another v. Global Ventures Group Ltd formerly known as Chrome World JP Ltd and Others [2026] HKCFI 2374, Freitas De Souza, Helton and Another v. AEON Credit Service (Asia) Co., Ltd [2026] HKDC 1072, and X v. Y Company [2026] HKDC 549.
Summary
Samantha Jane Bradley appealed against a 'Banning Order' obtained by Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons Limited prohibiting her from issuing further proceedings without leave. The Court of Final Appeal allowed the appeal, holding that Banning Orders must be subject to stringent requirements including a finding that the litigation was totally without merit, and the courts below had not applied the correct legal principles.
What legal provisions were engaged in Samantha Jane Bradley v. Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons Limited [2026] HKCFA 2?
The Court of Final Appeal decision engaged Article 35(1) of the Basic Law together with the Competition Ordinance, s 21L of the High Court Ordinance, the Landlord and Tenant (Consolidation) Ordinance, and the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance, decided 9 January 2026.
Did the Bradley v. Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons litigation continue after [2026] HKCFA 2?
Yes, a further Court of Final Appeal decision in the same matter was reported as Samantha Jane Bradley v. Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons Limited [2026] HKCFA 10, following the 9 January 2026 judgment.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (100)
Cited By (5)
Citation influence
HKLII records this judgment as cited by 2 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2026] HKCFA 2)