SIR ELLY KADOORIE & SONS LTD (FOR AND ON BEHALF OF ITSELF, ITS CURRENT AND FORMER OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS, INCLUDING ITS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, MESSRS SIMMONS & SIMMONS) V. SAMANTHA JANE BRADLEY

[2024] HKCA 747 Court of Appeal 26 August 2024 • CACV194/2023 • 59 min read
34 cases cited (3 HK, 31 foreign) Cited by 3 cases

Judges (3)

Counsel (6)

Parties (2)

Case Significance

Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons Ltd (for and on behalf of itself, its current and former officers, employees and agents, including its legal representatives, Messrs Simmons & Simmons) v Samantha Jane Bradley [2024] HKCA 747 is a Court of Appeal judgment dated 26 August 2024. Its reasoning engaged Secretary for Justice v Persons Conducting Themselves in Any of the Acts Prohibited under Paragraph 1(a), (b), (c) or (d) of the Indorsement of Claim (and 1 other) [2024] HKCA 442 among the authorities considered. The dispute continued in later Court of First Instance proceedings under the same case name, reported at [2025] HKCFI 1812 and [2025] HKCFI 4041, and was also referenced in Success Lane Development Ltd v IFC Development (Suite) Ltd as Agent for IFC Development Ltd [2024] HKDC 2184.

Which authority did the Court of Appeal engage with in Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons Ltd v Samantha Jane Bradley [2024] HKCA 747?

The Court of Appeal's reasoning in this 26 August 2024 judgment engaged Secretary for Justice v Persons Conducting Themselves in Any of the Acts Prohibited under Paragraph 1(a), (b), (c) or (d) of the Indorsement of Claim (and 1 other) [2024] HKCA 442 among the authorities it considered.

Did the Sir Elly Kadoorie & Sons Ltd v Samantha Jane Bradley dispute continue after the 2024 Court of Appeal ruling ([2024] HKCA 747)?

Yes. The same dispute continued in Court of First Instance proceedings reported at [2025] HKCFI 1812 and [2025] HKCFI 4041, and the 2024 Court of Appeal judgment was also referenced in Success Lane Development Ltd v IFC Development (Suite) Ltd [2024] HKDC 2184.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (34)

SLR (3)
[2001] 4 SLR 454 [2016] 1 SLR 1248 [2017] 1 SLR 373
UK (21)
[1979] AC 210 [1996] AC 284 [1997] AC 655 [2001] EWCA Civ 1721 [2002] EWHC 1380 [2004] 1 WLR 1503 [2004] EWHC 194 [2005] QB 848 [2007] 1 AC 224 [2010] EWHC 2612 [2013] 1 WLR 935 [2015] EWHC 2141 [2017] EWHC 1205 [2018] EWHC 241 [2020] 1 WLR 417 [2020] EWHC 163 [2021] EWHC 2542 [2021] EWHC 2996 [2023] 2 WLR 699 [2023] AC 389 [2024] 2 WLR 45
HK (10)
[2001] 1 HKLRD 736 [2006] 4 HKC 572 [2009] 4 HKLRD 315 [2013] 2 HKLRD 1197 [2014] 5 HKLRD 60 [2019] 5 HKLRD 500 [2020] HKCFI 826 [2023] 5 HKLRD 240 [2023] HKCFI 1478 [2024] HKCA 442

Cited By (3)

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 9 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

Related cases

Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2024] HKCA 747)