THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF GRENVILLE HOUSE V. WONG TAK KEUNG STANLEY AND ANOTHER

[2025] HKCA 1104 Court of Appeal 12 December 2025 • CACV344/2024 • 28 min read

2 cases cited (0 HK, 2 foreign)

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

the appeal is dismissed with costs to the Applicant.

Source: [2025] HKCA 1104, Court of Appeal, decided 12 December 2025. Read directly from the judgment.

Judges (3)

Barma Coram Cheung Coram Kwan Coram

Counsel (6)

Jones Day Firm King & Co Firm Anthony Chan Counsel Applicant Bernard Man Counsel Respondent Carol Wong Counsel Respondent Warren Suen Counsel Applicant

Parties (2)

The Incorporated Owners of Grenville House Applicant Wong Tak Keung Stanley and Claudia Canepa Wong Respondent

Case Significance

THE INCORPORATED OWNERS OF GRENVILLE HOUSE V. WONG TAK KEUNG STANLEY AND ANOTHER [2025] HKCA 1104 concerned section 44(1) of the Building Management Ordinance and the Buildings Ordinance. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, holding: "the appeal is dismissed with costs to the Applicant."

Summary

The Incorporated Owners of Grenville House appealed against Wong Tak Keung Stanley in a building management dispute. The case involved issues relating to the management and maintenance of the residential property. The Court of Appeal addressed the merits of the building management dispute.

What did the Court of Appeal rule in The Incorporated Owners of Grenville House v. Wong Tak Keung Stanley [2025] HKCA 1104?

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and ordered costs to the Applicant, in a dispute concerning section 44(1) of the Building Management Ordinance and the Buildings Ordinance.