CB V. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANOTHER

[2024] HKCA 172 Court of Appeal 22 February 2024 • CACV208/2022 • 75 min read

7 cases cited (0 HK, 7 foreign) Cited by 3 cases

Outcome

Appeal allowed

the appeal was allowed on the ground that the magistrate was wrong not to have allowed CB to be recalled in the second half of the trial to be cross-examined by Z’s lawyer.

Source: [2024] HKCA 172, Court of Appeal, decided 22 February 2024. Read directly from the judgment.

Judges (3)

Au Coram G Lam Coram Poon Coram

Counsel (6)

Department of Justice Firm Patricia Ho & Associates Firm Abraham Chan Counsel Applicant Albert N B Wong Counsel Applicant Jin Pao Counsel Respondent Martin Ho Counsel Respondent

Parties (4)

Commissioner of Police Putative Respondent Secretary for Justice Putative Respondent Secretary for Security Putative Interested Party Cb Applicant

Statutes Cited

Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance (Cap 383)

s 8

Cases Cited (7)

UK (1)

[2022] AC 1063

HK (6)

(2006) 9 HKCFAR 478 (2020) 23 HKCFAR 15 [2000] 2 HKLRD 833 [2017] 1 HKLRD 559 [2018] 3 HKLRD 778 [2022] HKCFI 1046

Cited By (3)

[2026] HKCFI 2620

QBD V. SECRETARY FOR SECURITY AND OTHERS

[2025] HKCFI 3604

LN V. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE

[2024] HKCFI 1983

N V. SECRETARY FOR SECURITY AND OTHERS (and 1 other)

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 4 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

[2025] HKCFI 3604 Court of First Instance

15 August 2025

[2025] HKCFA 10 Court of Final Appeal

11 June 2025

[2024] HKCFI 1983 Court of First Instance

31 July 2024

[2026] HKCFI 2620 Court of First Instance

16 July 2026