HKSAR V. LAW SIU HON (羅少韓) AND ANOTHER
5 cases cited
(0 HK, 5 foreign)
Judges (3)
Counsel (5)
Summary
Law Siu Hon and Lam Chuen Hon applied for leave to appeal against their convictions for wounding with intent. The key issue was whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing their appeal on the basis that no miscarriage of justice had actually occurred despite potential irregularities at trial. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
Statutes Cited
Criminal Procedure Ordinance
s 83
Magistrates Ordinance
s 119(1)(d)
Societies Ordinance
s 20(2)
Cases Cited (5)
UK (1)
[1992] 2 AC 228
HK (4)
(2000) 3 HKCFAR 387 (2001) 4 HKCFAR 319 [2009] 1 HKLRD 241 [2020] HKCFI 2096
Citation influence
HKLII records this judgment as cited by 2 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2026] HKCFA 3 HKCFA
HKSAR V. HUANG RUIFANG (黃瑞芳)
16 January 2026
[2025] HKCA 1152 HKCA
HKSAR V. LAM YING LUN
22 December 2025
[2025] HKCFA 24 HKCFA
HKSAR V. F.S.L.
15 December 2025
[2025] HKCA 1115 HKCA
HKSAR V. LEUNG CHUNG MAN AND ANOTHER
11 December 2025
[2025] HKCA 955 HKCA
HKSAR V. KWOK TSUN NING
30 October 2025
[2025] HKCA 788 HKCA
HKSAR V. LAI KAN YAU
26 August 2025
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2021] HKCFA 9)