TANG KWOK PANG V. KOT SEE FOR

[2021] HKCFA 31 Court of Final Appeal 17 August 2021 • FAMV255/2021 • 2 min read

Cited by 1 case

Judges (3)

Counsel (6)

Li & Lai Firm Mayer Brown Firm Ambrose Ho Counsel Defendant Esther Mak Counsel Plaintiff Jeff Chan Counsel Defendant Rimsky Yuen Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (4)

Au Yeung Ho Sum Defendant Kot See for Plaintiff Lam Man Cheung Defendant Tang Kwok Pang Defendant

Summary

Tang Kwok Pang applied for leave to appeal raising questions about the proper approach to claims of privilege against self-incrimination in civil proceedings, in light of section 33 of the Theft Ordinance. The case also involved disclosure obligations and the meaning of 'penalty' for self-incrimination purposes. Leave to appeal was granted with a stay of execution of an injunction order.

Statutes Cited

Theft Ordinance (Cap 210)

s 33

Cited By (1)

[2021] HKCFA 36

TANG KWOK PANG V. KOT SEE FOR

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 1 later judgment. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

[2021] HKCFA 36 Court of Final Appeal

29 October 2021