Hui Chun-sing 許俊聲

Barrister Kingston Chambers Called 1996 17 appearances

Hui Chun-sing appears as counsel of record in 17 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026), most often before the HKCFI. Member of Kingston Chambers.

About Hui Chun-sing

Hui Chun-sing appears as counsel of record in 17 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026). These were heard before HKCFI (13) and HKDC (4).

Source: derived from 17 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision 27 May 2026. Published on HKLII.

Professional record

Branch: Barrister
Chambers: Kingston Chambers
Year of call (HK): 1996

Registry facts from the Hong Kong Bar Association roster.

In the court record

Hui Chun-sing (許俊聲), called to the Bar in 1996 and practising from Kingston Chambers, appears primarily at first instance, most often in the Court of First Instance, and across the reported matters between 2024 and 2026 has most often been instructed as counsel for the accused. The practice concerns Criminal Law and Drug Offences, reflected in defence appearances including HKSAR v. Yu Tsz Tat [2026] HKCFI 3276, HKSAR v. Chow Chin Pang [2026] HKCFI 1567, HKSAR v. Law Chun Ho and Others [2026] HKCFI 1319, HKSAR v. Ip Chun Yin Jerry and Another [2025] HKCFI 6484 and HKSAR v. Law Ka Fai [2024] HKCFI 3410.

Hui has also appeared for the prosecution and, separately, as counsel for the defendant in the District Court, including HKSAR v. Ng Tin Yu [2026] HKDC 966 and HKSAR v. Lai Wa [2025] HKDC 1343 for the prosecution, and HKSAR v. Lo Tsz Yeung [2024] HKDC 841 as counsel for the defendant.

What role does Hui Chun-sing most often take in reported criminal matters?

Hui Chun-sing has most often been instructed as counsel for the accused, appearing in Court of First Instance drug and criminal matters such as HKSAR v. Yu Tsz Tat [2026] HKCFI 3276 and HKSAR v. Chow Chin Pang [2026] HKCFI 1567.

Has Hui Chun-sing appeared for the prosecution?

Yes. Hui Chun-sing has appeared as counsel for the prosecution in the District Court, including HKSAR v. Ng Tin Yu [2026] HKDC 966 and HKSAR v. Lai Wa [2025] HKDC 1343.