SKY KING MACHINERY ENGINEERING LTD V. CHINA HARBOUR ENGINEERING CO LTD

[2026] HKCA 816 Court of Appeal 5 May 2026 • CACV211/2023 • 10 min read

2 cases cited (0 HK, 2 foreign)

Outcome

Leave to appeal refused

leave to appeal is refused for the following reasons –

Source: [2026] HKCA 816, Court of Appeal, decided 5 May 2026. Read directly from the judgment.

Judges (3)

Barma Coram Chow Coram Mimmie Chan Coram

Counsel (6)

Wellington Legal LLP Firm Y.S. Lau & Partners Firm Christopher Chain SC Counsel Plaintiff Martin Lau Counsel Plaintiff Philips B F Wong Counsel Defendant Stewart Wong SC Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

China Harbour Engineering Company Limited Sharon Asia Waste Sorting Engineering Limited Defendant Sky King Machinery Engineering Limited Plaintiff

Case Significance

Sky King Machinery Engineering Ltd v. China Harbour Engineering Co Ltd [2026] HKCA 816 is a Court of Appeal decision concerning an application for leave to appeal. The judgment in [2026] HKCA 816 referred to the earlier authorities reported at [2023] HKCFI 1516 and (2022) 25 HKCFAR 288. The Court of Appeal held that "leave to appeal is refused for the following reasons –".

What was the outcome in Sky King Machinery Engineering Ltd v. China Harbour Engineering Co Ltd [2026] HKCA 816?

In Sky King Machinery Engineering Ltd v. China Harbour Engineering Co Ltd [2026] HKCA 816, the Court of Appeal refused leave to appeal, and its reasons referred to the earlier authorities reported at [2023] HKCFI 1516 and (2022) 25 HKCFAR 288.