RE SHRESTHA RAJ KUMAR

[2026] HKCA 7 Court of Appeal 9 January 2026 • CACV151/2025 • 4 min read
3 cases cited (0 HK, 3 foreign)

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

we dismiss the appeal accordingly.

Source: [2026] HKCA 7, Court of Appeal, decided 9 January 2026. Read directly from the judgment.

Judges (2)

Parties (1)

Case Significance

Re Shrestha Raj Kumar [2026] HKCA 7 was an appeal from Shrestha Raj Kumar v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2025] HKCFI 1054, challenging refusal of a non-refoulement claim. The Court of Appeal, referring to [2018] HKCA 524 and [2022] HKCA 627, dismissed the appeal, holding: "we dismiss the appeal accordingly."

Summary

Shrestha Raj Kumar, a Nepalese national, appealed against the refusal of leave to apply for judicial review of the Board's decision dismissing his non-refoulement claim. The Court of Appeal found the applicant failed to demonstrate the Board acted unlawfully, procedurally unfairly, or in a Wednesbury unreasonable manner. The appeal was dismissed.

What was the result of Re Shrestha Raj Kumar [2026] HKCA 7?

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal from Shrestha Raj Kumar v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2025] HKCFI 1054, holding "we dismiss the appeal accordingly," after considering [2018] HKCA 524 and [2022] HKCA 627.

Cases Cited (3)

HK (3)
[2018] HKCA 524 [2022] HKCA 627 [2025] HKCFI 1054

Related cases

Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2026] HKCA 7)