CHIANG SHAM LAM ANTHONY AND ANOTHER V. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING COUNCIL
Outcome
Application dismissedWe dismiss the application for leave to appeal.
Source: [2026] HKCA 391, Court of Appeal, decided 12 March 2026. Read directly from the judgment.
Judges (2)
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
Chiang Sham Lam Anthony and Another v. Accounting and Financial Reporting Council [2026] HKCA 391 is a Court of Appeal decision on an application for leave to appeal arising from disciplinary proceedings before the Accounting and Financial Reporting Council. The court held: 'We dismiss the application for leave to appeal.'
In reaching this result, the Court of Appeal considered its earlier approach to leave to appeal from disciplinary bodies in Li Sang Edward v. Disciplinary Board under the Land Survey Ordinance [2024] HKCA 197, alongside a broader set of authorities cited in the judgment.
What did the Court of Appeal decide in Chiang Sham Lam Anthony and Another v. Accounting and Financial Reporting Council [2026] HKCA 391?
The Court of Appeal held, 'We dismiss the application for leave to appeal,' rejecting the applicants' bid to pursue further appeal from disciplinary findings of the Accounting and Financial Reporting Council.
What earlier case did the court reference on leave to appeal from disciplinary bodies ([2026] HKCA 391)?
The judgment referenced Li Sang Edward v. Disciplinary Board under the Land Survey Ordinance [2024] HKCA 197 as part of its consideration of applications for leave to appeal from professional disciplinary determinations in Hong Kong.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (14)
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2026] HKCA 391)