HKSAR V. SHEHOZA VICENT KENNEDY AND ANOTHER
3 cases cited
(0 HK, 3 foreign)
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Summary
Shehoza Vicent Kennedy and Egina Samson Samson applied for leave to appeal against their District Court convictions for conspiracy to deal in goods to which a forged trade mark was applied. The applicants were convicted after a trial involving counterfeit luxury goods found at their Chungking Mansions stall. Leave to appeal against conviction was refused as the grounds lacked merit, and they were warned about loss of time.
Statutes Cited
Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200)
Theft Ordinance (Cap 210)
Cases Cited (3)
HK (3)
(2004) 7 HKCFAR 126 [2013] 6 HKC 300 [2023] HKDC 1111
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2025] HKCFI 3693 HKCFI
HKSAR V. AYUB GOHAR
9 May 2025
[2025] HKCFI 6331 HKCFI
HKSAR V. AHMED, SHERAZ
16 December 2025
[2025] HKCFI 6494 HKCFI
HKSAR V. AWAIS MOHAMMAD AND ANOTHER
11 December 2025
[2025] HKCA 1042 HKCA
HKSAR V. UMER-FAROOQ
19 November 2025
[2025] HKCA 932 HKCA
THE LAW SOCIETY OF HONG KONG V. JIM YIU MING AND ANOTHER (and 1 other)
16 October 2025
[2025] HKCFI 5542 HKCFI
HKSAR V. JANGA ELECTOR MOREBLESSING
22 September 2025
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2025] HKCA 687)