RE NURHAYATI-MARBUN

[2025] HKCA 472 Court of Appeal 30 May 2025 • CAMP221/2023 • 12 min read
8 cases cited (0 HK, 8 foreign)

Outcome

Leave to appeal refused

leave for judicial review was refused.

Source: [2025] HKCA 472, Court of Appeal, decided 30 May 2025. Read directly from the judgment.

Judges (2)

Parties (1)

Case Significance

In Re Nurhayati-Marbun [2025] HKCA 472, the Court of Appeal considered an application concerning the Immigration Ordinance and section 8 of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance, together with the Rules of the High Court. The court refused leave for judicial review, the sole outcome recorded for the matter.

Summary

Indonesian applicant Nurhayati-Marbun sought an extension of time to appeal the refusal of leave for judicial review of the Torture Claims Appeal Board's decision dismissing her non-refoulement claim. The CFI had refused leave and subsequently refused extension of time. The Court of Appeal (Barma and Au JJA) dismissed the application.

What was the outcome in Re Nurhayati-Marbun [2025] HKCA 472?

The Court of Appeal refused leave for judicial review in Re Nurhayati-Marbun [2025] HKCA 472, a matter raised under section 8 of the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance and the Immigration Ordinance, heard on 30 May 2025.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (8)

HK (8)
[2013] 1 HKC 526 [2016] 2 HKC 393 [2018] HKCA 246 [2018] HKCA 328 [2018] HKCA 400 [2018] HKCA 524 [2022] HKCFI 3182 [2023] HKCFI 730

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Read on HKLII

Source: HKLII ([2025] HKCA 472)