MOHAMMED BADAL ALIAS RASEL KHAN V. TORTURE CLAIMS APPEAL BOARD / NON-REFOULEMENT CLAIMS PETITION OFFICE
Outcome
Leave to appeal refusedleave to apply for judicial review was refused.
Source: [2025] HKCA 108, Court of Appeal, decided 11 February 2025. Read directly from the judgment.
Judges (2)
Case Significance
Mohammed Badal Alias Rasel Khan v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2025] HKCA 108 is a Court of Appeal decision dated 11 February 2025 concerning the Immigration Ordinance. The Court held that 'leave to apply for judicial review was refused.' The proceedings follow earlier stages in the same non-refoulement claim, including Mohammed Badal Alias Rasel Khan v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2024] HKCA 1038 and [2024] HKCFI 1949.
Summary
Bangladeshi national Mohammed Badal, alias Rasel Khan, applied for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal against the dismissal of his non-refoulement judicial review. The applicant's allegations were general and unsupported, failing to identify any specific error in the judgment. Leave was refused and the Notice of Motion dismissed.
What did the Court of Appeal decide in Mohammed Badal Alias Rasel Khan v. Torture Claims Appeal Board / Non-refoulement Claims Petition Office [2025] HKCA 108?
The Court of Appeal held that leave to apply for judicial review was refused, following the same applicant's earlier proceedings in [2024] HKCA 1038 and [2024] HKCFI 1949 under the Immigration Ordinance non-refoulement framework.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (2)
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2025] HKCA 108)