MARK ANTHONY SEABROOK V. HKSAR

[1999] HKCFA 43 Court of Final Appeal 11 March 1999 • FACC6/1998 • 22 min read

2 cases cited (0 HK, 2 foreign)

Outcome

Appeal allowed

the appeal is allowed with the result set out at the end of the judgment of Mr Justice Bokhary PJ.

Source: [1999] HKCFA 43, Court of Final Appeal, decided 11 March 1999. Read directly from the judgment.

Judges (5)

Bokhary Coram Ching Coram Court: Chief Justice Li Coram Litton Coram Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead Coram

Counsel (4)

Department of Justice Firm Arthur Luk Counsel Respondent Derek Lai Counsel Respondent John Mullick Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

HKSAR Respondent Mark Anthony Seabrook Appellant

Statutes Cited

Art 39 Art 48(12)

Dangerous Drugs Ordinance (Cap 134)

Cases Cited (2)

HK (2)

[1998] 2 HKLRD 46 [1998] 2 HKLRD 520

Citation influence

HKLII records this judgment as cited by 25 later judgments. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.

[2018] HKCFA 4 Court of Final Appeal

6 February 2018

[2019] HKCA 158 Court of Appeal

[2026] HKCA 67 Court of Appeal

20 January 2026

[2026] HKCA 1050 Court of Appeal

[2026] HKCA 127 Court of Appeal

3 February 2026

[2026] HKCA 1012 Court of Appeal

[2026] HKCA 1013 Court of Appeal

[2026] HKCA 1005 Court of Appeal

Related cases

Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

[2025] HKCA 1150 HKCA

HKSAR V. CHAN CHI CHEONG AND OTHERS

23 December 2025

[2025] HKCA 332 HKCA

HKSAR V. CHU HOI KAN

[2025] HKCA 138 HKCA

HKSAR V. LEUNG KWOK CHUNG

11 February 2025

[2024] HKCA 466 HKCA

HKSAR V. LI CHEUK WAH

13 September 2024

[2023] HKCFA 18 HKCFA

HKSAR V. NG CHIU MAN (吳釗民)

[2000] HKCFA 36 HKCFA

CHING KWOK YIN V. HKSAR

23 November 2000

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.

Source: HKLII ([1999] HKCFA 43)