Tax, Rates & Stamp Duty

56 cases · December 1999 to July 2026

Overview

Tax, Rates & Stamp Duty appears in 56 reported Hong Kong judgments (1999–2026).

Disputes with the government over profits tax, salaries tax, stamp duty, rates and other revenue matters.

This area concerns disputes between taxpayers and the government over the assessment and collection of revenue in Hong Kong. It includes profits tax on business income, salaries tax on employment earnings, stamp duty on the transfer of property and shares, rates and government rent on premises, and the various exemptions, deductions and reliefs that taxpayers claim. Common questions are whether a receipt is capital or income in nature, whether profits arise in or are derived from Hong Kong, whether an arrangement was entered into for a genuine commercial purpose, and how a transaction should be characterised for duty.

Revenue disputes typically reach the courts after the internal objection and appeal stages have been exhausted. Appeals on points of law from the Board of Review and related bodies are heard in the Court of First Instance, with further appeals to the Court of Appeal and, on questions of general public importance, to the Court of Final Appeal. Some duty and rating matters engage the District Court or the Lands Tribunal. The courts interpret the revenue legislation according to its language and purpose, and they scrutinise arrangements said to have been designed to avoid a charge.

Authorities in the recent record include [2024] HKCFI 439 and [2024] HKCFI 2590 on the assessment of profits and the reach of the charging provisions, [2024] HKCA 1111 on the appellate approach to revenue questions, and [2024] HKDC 1902 on duty and related matters. These decisions illustrate the consistent focus on substance and statutory purpose in revenue cases.

Court Distribution

Across 5 courts.

Key Cases

[2024] HKDC 1902
WU HUCHENG V. TIAN JIONG AND ANOTHER
19 November 2024
HKDC · cited by 3
[2024] HKCFI 439
WISE PEARL LTD V. THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
8 February 2024
HKCFI · cited by 3
[2024] HKCFI 3552
NG YIU CHI V. NG KWOK PIU PHILIP
9 December 2024
HKCFI · cited by 2
[2024] HKCFI 2590
CHAPMAN DEVELOPMENT LTD V. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
30 September 2024
HKCFI · cited by 2
[2024] HKCFI 2302
GG V. LL LTD
5 September 2024
HKCFI · cited by 2
[2024] HKCFI 419
NEW SPARKLE ROLL INTERNATIONAL GROUP LTD AND ANOTHER V. SZE CHING LAU AND ANOTHER
6 February 2024
HKCFI · cited by 2
[2026] HKCFI 125
KHO LUIS FABREGAS V. WU YOU
5 January 2026
HKCFI · cited by 1
[2025] HKCA 956
CHAPMAN DEVELOPMENT LTD V. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
30 October 2025
HKCA · cited by 1
[2025] HKCFI 1036
LEE ON WAI V. ATHORA LUX INVEST S.C.SP. - LOAN ORIGINATION AND ANOTHER
12 March 2025
HKCFI · cited by 1
[2024] HKCA 1111
FOXCONN (FAR EAST) LTD V. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
29 November 2024
HKCA · cited by 1
[2024] HKCFI 97
FOXCONN (FAR EAST) LTD V. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
5 January 2024
HKCFI · cited by 1
[2023] HKCFA 41
DR. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG KA-LAU V. THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
13 December 2023
HKCFA · cited by 1
[2026] HKCFI 3918
LAI CHIK KUN MICHAEL AND OTHERS V. THE BAPTIST CONVENTION OF HONG KONG AND ANOTHER
13 July 2026
HKCFI
[2026] HKDC 1071
CISSIE SUEN MIU LING, ALSO KNOWN AS SUEN MIU LING CISSIE V. KONG YUEN LING AND ANOTHER
22 June 2026
HKDC
[2026] HKCFI 3433
LAI CHIK KUN MICHAEL AND OTHERS V. THE BAPTIST CONVENTION OF HONG KONG AND ANOTHER
12 June 2026
HKCFI
[2026] HKCFI 2447
RE LAL DIPCHAND HARDASANI AND OTHERS
29 April 2026
HKCFI
[2026] HKCA 436
CHAPMAN DEVELOPMENT LTD V. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
16 March 2026
HKCA
[2026] HKDC 344
LI NA V. THE COLLECTOR OF STAMP REVENUE
9 March 2026
HKDC
[2026] HKCFI 1297
YIP YUEN CHUN SHIREA V. CHICK TAK HIM IN HIS CAPACITY AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF CHICK TAK HONG PETER
6 March 2026
HKCFI
[2026] HKCFI 876
HO WAI YIN V. COLLECTOR OF STAMP REVENUE
11 February 2026
HKCFI
[2025] HKDC 2120
THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE V. DRACO HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT LTD
16 December 2025
HKDC
[2025] HKDC 1777
BAREND LTD V. THE COLLECTOR OF STAMP REVENUE
10 December 2025
HKDC
[2025] HKCFI 5938
CHOI KING HUNG V. FUNG SHING CHUNG
9 December 2025
HKCFI
[2025] HKDC 1757
HO KIN TAI AND ANOTHER V. COLLECTOR OF STAMP REVENUE
22 October 2025
HKDC
[2025] HKCA 596
WISE PEARL LTD V. THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
29 September 2025
HKCA
[2025] HKCFI 3963
CHEUNG BING KEUNG PETER V. LI YUK SHING (and 1 other)
29 August 2025
HKCFI
[2025] HKCFA 11
JOHN WILEY & SONS UK2 LLP & ANOR V. THE COLLECTOR OF STAMP REVENUE
16 June 2025
HKCFA
[2025] HKCFI 2476
NCM V. FLICBL
4 June 2025
HKCFI
[2025] HKCFI 2220
MTR CORPORATION LTD V. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
27 May 2025
HKCFI
[2025] HKCA 398
RANDEEP S GREWAL V. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
9 May 2025
HKCA
[2025] HKCFI 1366
CAC INTERNATIONAL LTD V. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
11 April 2025
HKCFI
[2025] HKCFI 1546
DS V. EGHCL
9 April 2025
HKCFI
[2025] HKCFI 1282
SAMSUNG SDI (HONG KONG) LTD V. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
26 March 2025
HKCFI
[2025] HKCFI 544
SINOLINK SHANGHAI INVESTMENTS LTD V. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
4 February 2025
HKCFI
[2025] HKCFI 490
MAN CHIN CHIN IVY AND ANOTHER V. BLANDUS INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT LTD AND ANOTHER
28 January 2025
HKCFI
[2025] HKCFI 415
TOUAX CONTAINER INVESTMENT LTD V. THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
23 January 2025
HKCFI
[2025] HKCFI 301
CHAN V. INSTANT FINANCE LTD
13 January 2025
HKCFI
[2024] HKDC 2089
BOC GROUP LIFE ASSURANCE AND ANOTHER V. WONG FU WAH
13 December 2024
HKDC
[2024] HKCA 944
PATRICK COX ASIA LTD V. THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
17 October 2024
HKCA
[2024] HKCA 863
JOHN WILEY & SONS UK2 LLP AND ANOTHER V. THE COLLECTOR OF STAMP REVENUE
25 September 2024
HKCA
[2024] HKCFI 2418
CALLUM TREVOR LAM V. PC ENTERPRISES (HK) LTD AND OTHERS
19 September 2024
HKCFI
[2024] HKCFI 2344
HO SUK LING DORIS V. YEUNG WUN YEE
13 September 2024
HKCFI
[2024] HKCFI 2242
TOUAX CONTAINER INVESTMENT LTD V. THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
30 August 2024
HKCFI
[2024] HKCA 578
JOHN WILEY & SONS UK2 LLP AND ANOTHER V. THE COLLECTOR OF STAMP REVENUE
5 July 2024
HKCA
[2024] HKCFI 1235
SUN’S WORKSHOP CO LTD V. LANGOLD INVESTMENT LTD
3 May 2024
HKCFI
[2024] HKCFI 589
NG KIN SIU V. GENTLE SOAR LTD
8 March 2024
HKCFI
[2024] HKCFI 545
H&M HENNES & MAURITZ GBC AB V. ROADGET BUSINESS PTE LTD AND OTHERS
21 February 2024
HKCFI
[2024] HKCFI 493
LAU WANG CHI, BARRY V. CGS-CIMB SECURITIES (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD
19 February 2024
HKCFI
[2024] HKCFI 424
LKF V. ZTISL
31 January 2024
HKCFI
[2024] HKCFI 440
PONOMAROVA OLENA V. NORTHCROFT HONG KONG LTD
30 January 2024
HKCFI
[2024] HKLdT 1
WALL STREET 38 LTD V. COMMISSIONER OF RATING AND VALUATION
5 January 2024
HKLDT
[2023] HKCFA 36
DR. THE HONOURABLE LEUNG KA-LAU V. THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
10 November 2023
HKCFA
[2022] HKCFA 18
THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE V. KOO MING KOWN AND ANOTHER
5 August 2022
HKCFA
[2000] HKCFA 22
COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE V. SECAN LTD. AND ANOTHER
8 December 2000
HKCFA
[1999] HKCFA 80
THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE V. EMERSON RADIO CORPORATION
14 December 1999
HKCFA
[1999] HKCFA 9
EMERSON RADIO CORPORATION V. THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE
14 December 1999
HKCFA

How many Tax, Rates & Stamp Duty cases are reported in Hong Kong courts?

56 reported Hong Kong judgments (1999–2026) involve Tax, Rates & Stamp Duty.

What matters fall under tax, rates and stamp duty in Hong Kong?

The area covers profits tax, salaries tax, stamp duty on property and share transfers, rates and government rent, and the exemptions and reliefs attached to them. Disputes often turn on whether a receipt is capital or income, whether profits are sourced in Hong Kong, and how a transaction should be characterised.

How does a revenue dispute reach the courts?

A taxpayer generally first objects to an assessment and pursues an appeal to the Board of Review or other statutory body. Appeals on points of law are then heard in the Court of First Instance, with further appeals to the Court of Appeal and, where appropriate, the Court of Final Appeal.

How do courts treat arrangements said to avoid tax?

The courts interpret the revenue legislation according to its language and purpose and look at the substance of a transaction rather than only its form. Where an arrangement lacks a genuine commercial purpose and is designed to escape a charge, the court may decline to give it the intended tax effect.