Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office
Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office appears in 64 reported Hong Kong court cases (2025–2026), most often before the HKCFI.
About Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office
Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office appears in 64 reported Hong Kong court cases (2025–2026). Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office is recorded as Putative Respondent (59) and Defendant (46). These cases were heard before HKCFI (62) and HKCA (2).
Source: derived from 64 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision . Published on HKLII.
How many Singapore court cases involve Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office?
Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office appears in 64 reported Hong Kong court cases (2025–2026).
Which courts does Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office appear in?
Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office appears before HKCFI (62) and HKCA (2).
In the court record
The Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office has appeared most often as putative respondent, and in some matters as defendant, in judicial review and immigration proceedings brought by individual claimants before both the Court of Appeal and the Court of First Instance, most often the latter. In Sandeep Singh v Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCA 770 and Pramanick Sukumar v Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCA 697, the Office was named putative respondent before the Court of Appeal.
At first instance, the Office was named putative respondent in matters including Tiripathi Abhai Kumar v Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCFI 3704, Wajid Mohammed v Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCFI 3521, Shakir Seikh v Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCFI 3503, Muzibur Rahaman Alias Fazlu Rahaman v Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCFI 3242, and Zeeshan Mushtaq v Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCFI 2768, among other Court of First Instance proceedings brought between 2025 and 2026. These matters concern Judicial Review & Immigration.
What role has the Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office played in reported cases?
The Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office has appeared most often as putative respondent in judicial review and immigration matters brought by individual claimants, including Sandeep Singh v Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCA 770 before the Court of Appeal and Tiripathi Abhai Kumar v Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCFI 3704.
Which court hears most matters naming the Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office?
Matters naming the Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office as putative respondent are heard primarily by the Court of First Instance, as in Wajid Mohammed v Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCFI 3521 and Shakir Seikh v Non-Refoulement Claims Petition Office [2026] HKCFI 3503, with a smaller share before the Court of Appeal.