Massie & Clement
Massie & Clement appears in 11 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2025), most often before the HKCFI.
About Massie & Clement
Massie & Clement appears in 11 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2025). These were heard before HKCFI (5), HKDC (5) and HKFC (1).
Source: derived from 11 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision . Published on HKLII.
In the court record
Massie & Clement is a Hong Kong law firm reported between 2024 and 2025, appearing primarily at first instance, most often in the Court of First Instance, with further matters in the District Court and Family Court. Its reported record spans criminal law, drug offences, and work injuries and employees' compensation, and its role has varied by matter — most often as counsel for the defendant, but also as counsel for the accused, appellant, applicant, and plaintiff. In the criminal sphere, the firm acted as counsel for the accused in HKSAR v. Gomes de Sousa Eder [2025] HKCFI 1067 and HKSAR v. Khan Harris [2024] HKCFI 1481, and as counsel for the appellant in HKSAR v. Clement, Richard Mark [2024] HKCFI 204 and [2024] HKCFI 203; it also appeared for the defendant in HKSAR v. Kalembe Sarah [2024] HKDC 1495 and HKSAR v. Pathomworrakan Nichakan (a.k.a Maisam Orathai, Pathomworrakan Orathai and Pathomworrakan Nichakan Maisam Orathai) [2024] HKDC 1021.
Outside criminal work, the firm acted for the defendant in the personal injury matter Kwok Kit Ditau Yeung Suing by Next Friend the Official Solicitor v. Katherine Anna Abrat [2025] HKCFI 2755, for the applicant in the employees' compensation matters Kamaljit Kaur v. Fairwood Fast Food Ltd [2024] HKDC 1052 and Mohammad Akhtar v. Leung Kwok Cheong Formerly Trading as Chun Lok Transportation Company [2024] HKDC 251, for the plaintiff in Shauket Iqbal v. Wampum Engineering Company and Others [2024] HKDC 236, and in the Family Court matter CTW NEE CW v. SGW [2024] HKFC 195, working alongside co-counsel firms including Hastings & Co and Munros.
What areas of law does Massie & Clement practise in Hong Kong?
Massie & Clement's reported matters concern criminal law, drug offences, and work injuries and employees' compensation, spanning cases such as HKSAR v. Gomes de Sousa Eder [2025] HKCFI 1067 and Kamaljit Kaur v. Fairwood Fast Food Ltd [2024] HKDC 1052.
Which courts has Massie & Clement appeared before?
The firm appears primarily at first instance, most often in the Court of First Instance, with reported matters also in the District Court and Family Court, spanning 2024 to 2025, as in HKSAR v. Khan Harris [2024] HKCFI 1481.
Has Massie & Clement acted in appellate criminal proceedings?
Yes. The firm acted as counsel for the appellant in HKSAR v. Clement, Richard Mark [2024] HKCFI 204 and [2024] HKCFI 203, and as counsel for the accused in HKSAR v. Gomes de Sousa Eder [2025] HKCFI 1067.
Practice Areas (from the 39-area taxonomy)
Frequently instructed alongside
How many cases has Massie & Clement been involved in?
Massie & Clement appears in 11 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2025).
Which courts does Massie & Clement appear in?
Massie & Clement appears before HKCFI (5), HKDC (5) and HKFC (1).