LIMS, Solicitors 林志宇律師事務所

12 cases · 11 lawyers

LIMS, Solicitors appears in 12 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2025), most often before the HKDC.

About LIMS, Solicitors

LIMS, Solicitors appears in 12 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2025). These were heard before HKDC (7) and HKCFI (5).

Source: derived from 12 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision 28 November 2025. Published on HKLII.

In the court record

LIMS, Solicitors (林志宇律師事務所) is a Hong Kong law firm whose reported matters, from 2024 to 2025, appear primarily at first instance, most often in the District Court. The firm is most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, a role reflected in HKSAR v. Mak Chi Wan [2025] HKDC 1328 and HKSAR v. Au Chun Ho [2024] HKDC 1022. Reported matters concern Criminal Law, Drug Offences and Arbitration & Mediation.

The firm has also acted as counsel for the plaintiff in the recurring litigation Ip, Patrick v. Chan Meanne Ching Man, reported at [2025] HKDC 1967 and [2025] HKDC 1578, and Lam Po Yee v. Yu Shui Mui, reported at [2025] HKCFI 4245 and [2025] HKCFI 2734, and as counsel for the petitioner in Re HCT Technologies (Hong Kong) Co Ltd [2025] HKCFI 918. Matters have been co-counselled with Tung, Ng, Tse & Lam and Yan Lawyers.

What areas of law does LIMS, Solicitors handle?

LIMS, Solicitors' reported matters concern Criminal Law, Drug Offences and Arbitration & Mediation, appearing most often in the District Court, including as counsel for the defendant in HKSAR v. Tsea Wai Hung [2025] HKDC 869.

What is LIMS, Solicitors' typical role in reported matters?

LIMS, Solicitors is most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, though the firm has also acted for the plaintiff in the recurring Ip, Patrick v. Chan Meanne Ching Man litigation, reported at [2025] HKDC 1967 and [2025] HKDC 1578.