Kitty So & Tong 蘇潔兒, 唐淑萍律師行

8 cases · 6 lawyers

Kitty So & Tong appears in 8 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026), most often before the HKCFI.

About Kitty So & Tong

Kitty So & Tong appears in 8 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026). These were heard before HKCFI (7) and HKLDT (1).

Source: derived from 8 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision 28 April 2026. Published on HKLII.

In the court record

Kitty So & Tong (蘇潔兒, 唐淑萍律師行) appears primarily at first instance in Hong Kong, most often in the Court of First Instance, in matters reported between 2024 and 2026. It was most often instructed as counsel for the plaintiff, with reported work concentrated in loans and debt recovery, building management and owners' corporations, and company and shareholder disputes. The firm acted for the plaintiff in Bao Yuan Finance Ltd v Lau Yee Ting and Others [2026] HKCFI 3261 and [2026] HKCFI 1702, and in Zhang Shuren v Zhao Xiao Sheng and Others [2026] HKCFI 1386. In building management matters, the firm represented the plaintiff in Chan Wing Tong v The Incorporated Owners of Kam Chung Building (Jaffe Road) and Others [2024] HKCFI 2213 and [2024] HKCFI 508, and appeared for the respondent before the Lands Tribunal in The Incorporated Owners of Kin Wing Commercial Building v World Treasure Properties Ltd [2024] HKLdT 24.

What role does Kitty So & Tong most often play in Hong Kong litigation?

Kitty So & Tong (蘇潔兒, 唐淑萍律師行) was most often instructed as counsel for the plaintiff, appearing mainly in the Court of First Instance, including in Bao Yuan Finance Ltd v Lau Yee Ting and Others [2026] HKCFI 3261.

Has Kitty So & Tong appeared in building management disputes?

Yes. The firm acted for the plaintiff in Chan Wing Tong v The Incorporated Owners of Kam Chung Building (Jaffe Road) and Others [2024] HKCFI 2213 and for the respondent in The Incorporated Owners of Kin Wing Commercial Building v World Treasure Properties Ltd [2024] HKLdT 24.