King & Company 譚德興程國豪劉麗卿律師行

6 cases · 6 lawyers

King & Company appears in 6 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026), most often before the HKDC.

About King & Company

King & Company appears in 6 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026). These were heard before HKDC (2), HKCFI (2) and HKFC (1).

Source: derived from 6 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision 17 April 2026. Published on HKLII.

In the court record

King & Company (譚德興程國豪劉麗卿律師行) is a Hong Kong law firm with reported matters from 2024 to 2026 across the Court of Appeal, the Court of First Instance, the District Court and the Family Court, concentrated in loans and debt recovery, children, custody and adoption, and criminal law. The firm has repeatedly acted as counsel for the plaintiff in Pacific Ace Finance Ltd v. Delay, Gilda H. and Another (and 1 other), reported at [2026] HKDC 669 and [2025] HKDC 1161, and in Craft Bamboo Holdings Ltd v. Richard Paul Coleman and Another, reported at [2024] HKCFI 2482 and [2024] HKCFI 1509.

King & Company also appeared as counsel for the respondent in the Family Court matter WHK v. LCH [2024] HKFC 147, and is named in the Court of Appeal proceedings Secretary for Justice v. Oliinyk Alla (and 1 other) [2024] HKCA 296.

What is King & Company's practice focus?

King & Company (譚德興程國豪劉麗卿律師行) is reported in loans and debt recovery, children, custody and adoption, and criminal law matters between 2024 and 2026, most often as counsel for the plaintiff before the Court of First Instance and District Court.

What debt recovery matters has King & Company handled?

The firm repeatedly acted as counsel for the plaintiff in Pacific Ace Finance Ltd v. Delay, Gilda H. and Another (and 1 other), reported at [2026] HKDC 669 and [2025] HKDC 1161, and in Craft Bamboo Holdings Ltd v. Richard Paul Coleman and Another, reported at [2024] HKCFI 2482 and [2024] HKCFI 1509.