Hoosenally & Neo 何梁律師行
Hoosenally & Neo appears in 4 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2025), most often before the HKDC.
About Hoosenally & Neo
Hoosenally & Neo appears in 4 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2025). These were heard before HKDC (4).
Source: derived from 4 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision . Published on HKLII.
In the court record
Hoosenally & Neo (何梁律師行) is a Hong Kong law firm whose reported record is concentrated in the District Court, most often instructed as counsel for the defendant. Its practice spans Criminal Law, Building Management & Owners' Corporations and Drug Offences, illustrated by HKSAR v. Cheng Wai Leung [2025] HKDC 122 and HKSAR v. Lam Wai Nang [2024] HKDC 211, in both of which it acted as counsel for the defendant. The firm was also instructed as counsel for the plaintiff in Lai Pui San v. Tam Yuk Ha [2024] HKDC 1639, and as counsel for the defendant in the building management dispute Tsoi Cheong Wang v. Ngai Sze Wai trading as Lengend Design Engineering Company [2025] HKDC 814, appearing alongside Ho & Associates as co-counsel.
What kind of matters has Hoosenally & Neo handled?
Hoosenally & Neo (何梁律師行) has appeared in the District Court, most often as counsel for the defendant, in Criminal Law, Building Management & Owners' Corporations and Drug Offences matters, including HKSAR v. Cheng Wai Leung [2025] HKDC 122 and HKSAR v. Lam Wai Nang [2024] HKDC 211.
Practice Areas (from the 39-area taxonomy)
Frequently instructed alongside
How many cases has Hoosenally & Neo been involved in?
Hoosenally & Neo appears in 4 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2025).
Which courts does Hoosenally & Neo appear in?
Hoosenally & Neo appears before HKDC (4).