Heyman Tang & Wong 鄧卓熹黃汝仲律師行

6 cases · 6 lawyers

Heyman Tang & Wong appears in 6 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026), most often before the HKDC.

About Heyman Tang & Wong

Heyman Tang & Wong appears in 6 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026). These were heard before HKDC (4) and HKCFI (2).

Source: derived from 6 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision 27 May 2026. Published on HKLII.

In the court record

Heyman Tang & Wong (鄧卓熹黃汝仲律師行) is a Hong Kong law firm whose reported matters, dated 2024 to 2026, were most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, appearing primarily at first instance and most often in the District Court. The practice covers Criminal Law, Building Management & Owners' Corporations and Drug Offences, illustrated by the defence instructions HKSAR v. Gvangsanit Wanna and Another [2026] HKDC 843 and HKSAR v. Chuck Sze Ming [2026] HKDC 272.

The firm has also appeared for the plaintiff in Dong Li v. Lam Pu Qiao [2026] HKCFI 2612, for the defendant in the building-management dispute Ho Sai Cheong and Another v. Honest Gate Company Ltd [2025] HKDC 832, and represented one defendant, referred to as D44 Shum Lester, in the criminal matter HKSAR v. Ng Gordon Ching Hang and Others [2024] HKCFI 3298.

What is Heyman Tang & Wong's role profile in Hong Kong matters?

Heyman Tang & Wong was most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, appearing primarily in the District Court, with matters spanning Criminal Law, Building Management & Owners' Corporations and Drug Offences between 2024 and 2026.

Has Heyman Tang & Wong appeared in building-management disputes?

Yes. The firm acted for the defendant in Ho Sai Cheong and Another v. Honest Gate Company Ltd [2025] HKDC 832, part of its Building Management & Owners' Corporations practice.