Heung Massie & Clement 香馬祁律師事務所

14 cases · 13 lawyers

Heung Massie & Clement appears in 14 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026), most often before the HKDC.

About Heung Massie & Clement

Heung Massie & Clement appears in 14 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026). These were heard before HKDC (9), HKCFI (3) and HKCA (2).

Source: derived from 14 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision 10 July 2026. Published on HKLII.

In the court record

Heung Massie & Clement (香馬祁律師事務所) is a Hong Kong law firm whose reported matters, dated 2024 to 2026, were most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, appearing primarily at first instance and most often in the District Court. The practice spans Criminal Law, Drug Offences and Banking & Finance, reflected in Court of Appeal work such as Bank of Communications (Hong Kong) Ltd v. China Fortune Enterprises Ltd and Others [2025] HKCA 945 and Chan Kin Man v. Commissioner of Police [2025] HKCA 542.

At first instance the firm has defended criminal matters including HKSAR v. Lopez Bastidas Jean Carlos [2026] HKDC 1242 and HKSAR v. Barba Camacho Nixon [2026] HKCFI 3741, and has acted for the defendant in the commercial dispute Dingway Investment Ltd (in Compulsory Liquidation) v. China City Construction & Development Co., (Hong Kong) Ltd and Others [2026] HKCFI 1976.

What is Heung Massie & Clement's role profile?

Heung Massie & Clement was most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, appearing primarily in the District Court, with matters spanning Criminal Law, Drug Offences and Banking & Finance between 2024 and 2026.

What appellate work has Heung Massie & Clement handled?

The firm has appeared before the Court of Appeal, including as defendant in Bank of Communications (Hong Kong) Ltd v. China Fortune Enterprises Ltd and Others [2025] HKCA 945 and as applicant in Chan Kin Man v. Commissioner of Police [2025] HKCA 542.