G

Gilbert Tang & Co 鄧澤林、廖國華律師行

9 cases · 11 lawyers

Gilbert Tang & Co appears in 9 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026), most often before the HKCFI.

About Gilbert Tang & Co

Gilbert Tang & Co appears in 9 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026). These were heard before HKCFI (5) and HKDC (4).

Source: derived from 9 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision . Published on HKLII.

In the court record

Gilbert Tang & Co (鄧澤林、廖國華律師行) is a Hong Kong law firm whose reported matters between 2024 and 2026 concern land and property, arbitration and mediation, and building management and owners' corporations, split across the Court of First Instance and District Court. The firm is most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, as in Wing Lok Construction & Engineering Co Ltd v. Techoy Construction Co Ltd [2025] HKCFI 5546 and [2025] HKCFI 3310, Sam Hei Tai Hing Foods Co Ltd and Another v. The Incorporated Owners of Waford Industrial Building [2026] HKCFI 781, and Ko Yin Fun v. Ko Chi Hung and Another [2024] HKCFI 1608.

On the plaintiff side, the firm acted in Tsuen Wan Tung Po Tor Monastery Ltd v. Feng Dayao and Wu Sujie, the Executors of the Estate of Sik Liu Chi and Others [2026] HKCFI 3925 and Shine Archit. Design Ltd v. Yee Wai Fong and Others [2024] HKDC 147. It also represented the monastery as defendant in the earlier Wong Koon Chung v. Tsuen Wan Tung Po Tor Monastery Ltd [2024] HKDC 1284. District Court matters have also included Lok Kwan (formerly known as Lok Sui Kwan) v. Wong Yu Chi [2025] HKDC 1523 and Centaline Property Agency Ltd v. Liu Wing Yan [2024] HKDC 1466, and the firm has worked with co-counsel firms such as Samuel Chow Solicitors and Ravenscroft & Schmierer.

What kinds of disputes does Gilbert Tang & Co handle in Hong Kong?

Gilbert Tang & Co (鄧澤林、廖國華律師行) most often handles land and property, arbitration and mediation, and building management disputes, appearing before the Court of First Instance and District Court, as in Wing Lok Construction & Engineering Co Ltd v. Techoy Construction Co Ltd [2025] HKCFI 5546.

Has Gilbert Tang & Co represented both sides of a construction dispute?

The firm acted as counsel for the defendant in Wing Lok Construction & Engineering Co Ltd v. Techoy Construction Co Ltd, reported in both [2025] HKCFI 5546 and the earlier [2025] HKCFI 3310, on the same underlying construction dispute.

What role has Gilbert Tang & Co played for the Tsuen Wan Tung Po Tor Monastery?

Gilbert Tang & Co represented the monastery as defendant in Wong Koon Chung v. Tsuen Wan Tung Po Tor Monastery Ltd [2024] HKDC 1284, and later acted for the plaintiff side brought by its executors in Tsuen Wan Tung Po Tor Monastery Ltd v. Feng Dayao and Wu Sujie and Others [2026] HKCFI 3925.

Practice Areas (from the 39-area taxonomy)

Frequently instructed alongside

How many cases has Gilbert Tang & Co been involved in?

Gilbert Tang & Co appears in 9 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026).

Which courts does Gilbert Tang & Co appear in?

Gilbert Tang & Co appears before HKCFI (5) and HKDC (4).

9
Cases
11
Lawyers (in cases)
9
Appearances
2
Courts

Lawyers (11)

Cases (9)