Edwin So & Co. Solicitors 蘇全富律師行
Edwin So & Co. Solicitors appears in 4 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026), most often before the HKDC.
About Edwin So & Co. Solicitors
Edwin So & Co. Solicitors appears in 4 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026). These were heard before HKDC (4).
Source: derived from 4 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision . Published on HKLII.
In the court record
Edwin So & Co. Solicitors (蘇全富律師行) is a Hong Kong law firm whose reported work centres on the District Court, most often instructed as counsel for the defendant. The firm's practice concerns criminal law, including drug offences and theft, fraud and dishonesty, alongside civil matters. It acted for the defendant in HKSAR v. Matute Metchie Pinated [2026] HKDC 447, HKSAR v. Li Peng [2025] HKDC 1996 and HKSAR v. Cheung Yuk Sim [2025] HKDC 807.
On the civil side, the firm appeared for the plaintiff in Chan Chi Fai v. Hip Wo Engineering Transportation Ltd [2024] HKDC 1931, a matter in which Ellen Au & Co also appeared as co-counsel. Reported matters span from 2024 to 2026.
What court does Edwin So & Co. Solicitors most often appear in?
Edwin So & Co. Solicitors (蘇全富律師行) appears primarily in the District Court, most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, as in HKSAR v. Matute Metchie Pinated [2026] HKDC 447 and HKSAR v. Li Peng [2025] HKDC 1996.
What type of matters does Edwin So & Co. Solicitors handle?
The firm's reported matters concern criminal law, including drug offences and theft, fraud and dishonesty, such as HKSAR v. Cheung Yuk Sim [2025] HKDC 807, alongside civil work including Chan Chi Fai v. Hip Wo Engineering Transportation Ltd [2024] HKDC 1931.
Practice Areas (from the 39-area taxonomy)
Frequently instructed alongside
How many cases has Edwin So & Co. Solicitors been involved in?
Edwin So & Co. Solicitors appears in 4 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026).
Which courts does Edwin So & Co. Solicitors appear in?
Edwin So & Co. Solicitors appears before HKDC (4).