Davis Polk & Wardwell

6 cases · 8 lawyers

Davis Polk & Wardwell appears in 6 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026), most often before the HKCFI.

About Davis Polk & Wardwell

Davis Polk & Wardwell appears in 6 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026). These were heard before HKCFI (6).

Source: derived from 6 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision 22 June 2026. Published on HKLII.

In the court record

Davis Polk & Wardwell is a Hong Kong law firm most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, appearing exclusively in the Court of First Instance in matters reported between 2024 and 2026. Its reported practice concerns bankruptcy and insolvency, company and shareholder disputes, and contract and commercial disputes. The firm has acted for defendants in Luen Tat Watch Band Manufacturer Ltd v. Stephen Liu Yiu Keung and Another [2026] HKCFI 3259 and [2026] HKCFI 2564, in China Medical Technologies, Inc. (In Liquidation) and Another v. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP (A Firm) and Another [2026] HKCFI 3509, and in Liu, Peibao v. Tencent Holdings Ltd [2024] HKCFI 1158.

The firm also appeared in the insolvency-related matters Re CEIBS Publishing Group Ltd [2025] HKCFI 5736 and The Official Receiver v. Yen Ching Wai, David (aka David Yen Ching Wai) and Another [2024] HKCFI 546.

What role does Davis Polk & Wardwell typically play in Hong Kong proceedings?

The firm is most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, appearing exclusively in the Court of First Instance, with reported matters concentrated in bankruptcy and insolvency, company and shareholder disputes, and contract and commercial disputes between 2024 and 2026.

What cases has Davis Polk & Wardwell appeared in?

Reported matters include Luen Tat Watch Band Manufacturer Ltd v. Stephen Liu Yiu Keung and Another [2026] HKCFI 3259, China Medical Technologies, Inc. v. Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP (A Firm) and Another [2026] HKCFI 3509, and Liu, Peibao v. Tencent Holdings Ltd [2024] HKCFI 1158.