Chu & Co, Solicitors 朱美枝律師事務所
Chu & Co, Solicitors appears in 3 reported Hong Kong judgments (2026), most often before the HKDC.
About Chu & Co, Solicitors
Chu & Co, Solicitors appears in 3 reported Hong Kong judgments (2026). These were heard before HKDC (2) and HKLDT (1).
Source: derived from 3 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision . Published on HKLII.
In the court record
Chu & Co, Solicitors (朱美枝律師事務所) appears primarily at first instance, most often before the District Court, with matters reported in 2026 concerning building management & owners' corporations, contract & commercial disputes and criminal law. The firm acted as counsel for the respondent in The Incorporated Owners of Pak Tat Mansion v. Tang Kee Tong Trading as Chili King [2026] HKLdT 26 before the Lands Tribunal, as counsel for the plaintiff in 黃天昕 v. 關劍麟 [2026] HKDC 787, and as counsel for the defendant in HKSAR v. Wong Ka Wa [2026] HKDC 370, alongside co-counsel Thomas Li & Yu.
What courts has Chu & Co, Solicitors appeared before?
The firm appears primarily at first instance, most often before the District Court, with a further matter before the Lands Tribunal in The Incorporated Owners of Pak Tat Mansion v. Tang Kee Tong Trading as Chili King [2026] HKLdT 26.
What kinds of matters has Chu & Co, Solicitors handled?
Reported matters, all from 2026, concern building management & owners' corporations, contract & commercial disputes and criminal law, including the criminal defence HKSAR v. Wong Ka Wa [2026] HKDC 370.
Practice Areas (from the 39-area taxonomy)
Frequently instructed alongside
How many cases has Chu & Co, Solicitors been involved in?
Chu & Co, Solicitors appears in 3 reported Hong Kong judgments (2026).
Which courts does Chu & Co, Solicitors appear in?
Chu & Co, Solicitors appears before HKDC (2) and HKLDT (1).