Chan & Ho 陳何律師事務所
Chan & Ho appears in 13 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026), most often before the HKDC.
About Chan & Ho
Chan & Ho appears in 13 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026). These were heard before HKDC (7), HKCFI (5) and HKCA (1).
Source: derived from 13 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision . Published on HKLII.
In the court record
Chan & Ho (陳何律師事務所) is a Hong Kong law firm reported between 2024 and 2026, appearing primarily at first instance, most often in the District Court. Its reported matters concern Criminal Law, Land & Property and Loans & Debt Recovery, with the firm most often instructed as counsel for the defendant. Before the Court of Appeal, it acted for the appellant in Roderick Miller v. The Law Society of Hong Kong [2024] HKCA 741. In the District Court, it has repeatedly acted for the defendant in criminal matters including HKSAR v. Tang Zhirong [2026] HKDC 267, HKSAR v. See Ping Hon [2025] HKDC 1546, HKSAR v. Lin Qunxiang [2025] HKDC 1086 and HKSAR v. Nguyen Xuan Cuong (also known as Yuen Kwok Keung and Yuen Chun Keung) [2025] HKDC 282.
The firm has also acted for the plaintiff in debt-recovery and property matters, including Ever-Long Finance Ltd v. Lam Sai Kit and Another [2025] HKDC 1863 and the recurring litigation Yes Capital Ltd v. Yeung Se Wang Stephen and Another [2025] HKCFI 3891 and Yes Capital Ltd v. Chui Sau Chi and Another [2024] HKDC 695. At first instance, it has acted for the defendant in China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd and Others v. Zhang Caikui and Others [2025] HKCFI 1868. Co-counsel appearances span firms including Deacons, Dechert and Haldanes.
What courts has Chan & Ho appeared before?
Chan & Ho (陳何律師事務所) has appeared primarily at first instance, most often in the District Court, in matters reported between 2024 and 2026 including HKSAR v. Tang Zhirong [2026] HKDC 267 and Roderick Miller v. The Law Society of Hong Kong [2024] HKCA 741.
What role has the firm most often held?
The firm was most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, as in HKSAR v. See Ping Hon [2025] HKDC 1546 and China Shanshui Cement Group Ltd and Others v. Zhang Caikui and Others [2025] HKCFI 1868, though it has also acted for plaintiffs in debt-recovery matters.
What practice areas does Chan & Ho's reported work concern?
The reported matters concern Criminal Law, Land & Property and Loans & Debt Recovery, including Ever-Long Finance Ltd v. Lam Sai Kit and Another [2025] HKDC 1863 and Kingdom Power Development Ltd v. The Incorporated Owners of Cheong Wah Building, Tsuen Wan [2025] HKCFI 1305.
Practice Areas (from the 39-area taxonomy)
Frequently instructed alongside
How many cases has Chan & Ho been involved in?
Chan & Ho appears in 13 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026).
Which courts does Chan & Ho appear in?
Chan & Ho appears before HKDC (7), HKCFI (5) and HKCA (1).