CAN Lawyers 鄭姚梁律師事務所

7 cases · 6 lawyers

CAN Lawyers appears in 7 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026), most often before the HKDC.

About CAN Lawyers

CAN Lawyers appears in 7 reported Hong Kong judgments (2024–2026). These were heard before HKDC (5) and HKCFI (2).

Source: derived from 7 published Hong Kong judgments, most recent decision 22 June 2026. Published on HKLII.

In the court record

CAN Lawyers (鄭姚梁律師事務所) appears primarily at first instance in Hong Kong, most often in the District Court, with further matters before the Court of First Instance. The firm was most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, appearing in criminal proceedings such as HKSAR v. Bunruangsak Burin (and 1 other) [2026] HKDC 655, HKSAR v. Ho Chi Ho and Another (and 2 others) [2025] HKDC 1700 and HKSAR v. So Man Ho [2025] HKDC 113, as well as the civil matter Wong Shing Tat v. Wong Mei Lin and Another [2026] HKDC 813.

The reported matters concern Criminal Law, Bankruptcy & Insolvency and Money Laundering & Proceeds of Crime. The firm acted as respondent's counsel in Wong Kwong Miu v. Pepper Blossom Ltd and Others [2026] HKCFI 3577, for a supporting creditor in Fu Qike v. China First Capital Group Ltd [2025] HKCFI 1441, and for the plaintiff in Choi Wai Kwong v. Choi Wai Keung [2024] HKDC 571.

What role does CAN Lawyers typically play in Hong Kong court matters?

CAN Lawyers is most often instructed as counsel for the defendant, frequently in criminal proceedings such as HKSAR v. Bunruangsak Burin (and 1 other) [2026] HKDC 655 and HKSAR v. So Man Ho [2025] HKDC 113.

What practice areas does CAN Lawyers' reported casework cover?

The reported matters concern Criminal Law, Bankruptcy & Insolvency and Money Laundering & Proceeds of Crime, including Fu Qike v. China First Capital Group Ltd [2025] HKCFI 1441, where the firm acted for a supporting creditor.