C, S (FORMERLY KNOWN AS C, S) V. W, CT
5 cases cited
(0 HK, 5 foreign)
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Parties (2)
Summary
Both parties in divorce proceedings sought leave to appeal against the court's ancillary relief decision. The court refused leave to both parties, finding no reasonable prospect of success in either intended appeal, and varied the costs order to require the petitioner wife to pay the respondent husband's costs of her unsuccessful leave application.
Statutes Cited
District Court Ordinance (Cap 336)
Cases Cited (5)
UK (2)
[2006] 2 AC 618 [2006] 2 WLR 1283
HK (3)
[2009] 4 HKLRD 125 [2010] 6 HKC 528 [2011] 3 HKLRD 759
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2025] HKFC 75 HKFC
C, S (FORMERLY KNOWN AS C, S) V. W, CT
9 May 2025
[2026] HKFC 55 HKFC
LSM V. SWCR AND OTHERS
17 April 2026
[2025] HKFC 192 HKFC
KYCE V. HA
24 November 2025
[2025] HKFC 102 HKFC
LSM V. SWCR AND OTHERS
1 August 2025
[2024] HKFC 145 HKFC
LKYI V. GJS, AS THE PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF KO , THE DECEASED
2 August 2024
[2026] HKCFI 773 HKCFI
HKSAR V. L. Z. X. AND ANOTHER
25 February 2026
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2026] HKFC 9)