黃嘉謀 V. 油塘工業大廈第三座業主立案法團
11 cases cited
(0 HK, 11 foreign)
Cited by 1 case
Outcome
Claim allowedI therefore allow the claim for loss of rental income from 1 January 2023 to the date of judgment, a period of 24.22 months.
Source: [2026] HKDC 44, District Court, decided 7 January 2026. Read directly from the judgment.
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Cases Cited (11)
UK (1)
[1940] AC 880
HK (10)
[1993] 2 HKC 356 [2009] 5 HKLRD 513 [2014] 4 HKLRD 52 [2016] HKCFI 179 [2021] HKCFI 2018 [2022] HKCFI 376 [2023] HKDC 1697 [2023] HKDC 198 [2024] HKCFI 1061 [2024] HKDC 1902
Cited By (1)
Citation influence
HKLII records this judgment as cited by 1 later judgment. This counts every later Hong Kong judgment that references this case, which is broader than the resolved citations listed above.
Related cases
Other Hong Kong judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
[2026] HKDC 770 HKDC
黃嘉謀 V. 油塘工業大廈第三座業主立案法團
29 April 2026
[2026] HKDC 1124 HKDC
LI SAN CHI V. ALPHA WATCH AND JEWELLERY LTD AND OTHERS
26 June 2026
[2026] HKCA 601 HKCA
PREMIER CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LTD V. SO WANG FUNG AND ANOTHER
1 April 2026
[2025] HKCA 1152 HKCA
HKSAR V. LAM YING LUN
22 December 2025
[2025] HKCFI 5633 HKCFI
NOBLESEED PARTNERS LTD V. ZHANG QIAN QIAN
19 November 2025
[2025] HKCFI 753 HKCFI
NOBLESEED PARTNERS LTD V. ZHANG QIAN QIAN
20 February 2025
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Hong Kong Courts portal.
Read on HKLIISource: HKLII ([2026] HKDC 44)